Visible Logic: Algorithmic Drawing and the Construction of Form

Authors

  • Leonardo Baglioni Department of History, Representation and Restoration of Architecture, Sapienza Università di Roma
  • Michele Calvano Department of History, Representation and Restoration of Architecture, Sapienza Università di Roma https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-2173
  • Graziano Mario Valenti Department of History, Representation and Restoration of Architecture, Sapienza Università di Roma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-5862

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.17.2025.17

Keywords:

algorithmic drawing, indirect modeling, generative process, constructive logic

Abstract

The paper explores algorithmic drawing as both a critical and operational tool, highlighting its capacity to transform representation into a constructive process. Drawing has always possessed a generative nature: it does not merely depict an idea but establishes its validity by gradually constructing the spatial field of form. The digital transcription of algorithmic logics amplifies this dimension, translating the graphic gesture into sequences of rules, constraints, and parameters that render the entire design chain, from conception to realization, transparent. Indirect modeling, in particular, allows form to be conceived as a relational field, where dependencies among elements define coherent behaviors under transformation. The chain of models (conceptual, exploratory, continuous, procedural, fabrication, and physical) produces not only representations but genuine constructive programs capable of integrating geometric constraints, production requirements, and performance objectives. The case studies demonstrate how algorithmic drawing enables the management of complex forms, their translation into efficient constructive systems, and the preservation of project identity through variations, a visible logic that reaffirms and enhances the constructive nature of drawing.

References

Burry, M. (2013). From Descriptive Geometry to Smartgeometry: First Steps Towards Digital Architecture. In B. Peters, T. Peters (Eds). Inside Smartgeometry: Expanding the Architectural Possibilities of Computational Design, pp. 154-165. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Calvano, M., Mancini, M.F. (2020). Massive wood design – From complex shape to efficient construction. In DN, No. 6, pp. 102-115.

Calvano, M., Mancini, M.F. (2021). Testing and Defining a Complex Design Through Digital and Physical Models. In Nexus Network Journal, No. 23(4), pp. 995-1016. DOI: 10.1007/s00004-021-00569-6.

Calvano, M., Cognoli, R. (2024). Oltre la misura: modelli parametrici per la realizzazione assistita del progetto. In F. Bergamo, A. Calandriello, M. Ciammaichella, I. Friso, F. Gay, G. Liva, C. Monteleone (a cura di). Measure / Out of Measure. Devising Knowing Narrating. Proceedings of the 45th International Confeence of Representation Disciplines Teachers. Padova-Venezia,12-14 settembre 2024, pp. 175-194. Milano: FrancoAngeli. DOI: 10.3280/oa-1180-c478.

Carpo, M. (2017). The Second Digital Turn: Design Beyond Intelligence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Cognoli, R. (2024). Digital Circular Timber (DCT). Timber reuse through design and fabrication automation. PhD thesis in Architecture, Design, Planning. Supevisor Prof. R. Ruggiero. Università degli Studi di Camerino. <https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/210673> (accessed 5 July 2025).

Kolarevic, B. (2016). Simplexity (and Complexity) in Architecture. In A. Herneoja, T. Österlund, P. Markkanen (Eds.). Complexity & Simplicity. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe. Oulu, 24-26 August 2016, Vol. 1, pp. 25-31. Oulu: University of Oulu.

Loria, G. (1935). Metodi matematici. Milano: Ulrico Hoepli.

Migliari, R. (a cura di). (2004). Disegno come modello. Riflessioni sul disegno nell’era informatica. Roma: Edizioni Kappa.

Migliari, R. (2009). Geometria descrittiva. Volume II – Tecniche e applicazioni. Novara: Città Studi Edizioni.

Pottmann, H., Eigensatzc, M., Vaxman, A. Wallner, J. (2007). Architectural Geometry. Exton: Bentley Institute Press.

Reichert, S., Schwinn, T., La Magna, R., Waimer, F., Knippers, J., Menges, A. (2014). Fibrous structures: An integrative approach to design computation, simulation and fabrication for lightweight, glass and carbon-composite structures in architecture based on biomimetic design principles. In Computer-Aided Design, No. 52, pp. 27-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.005.

Tedeschi, A. (2014). AAD_Algorithms-Aided Design. Potenza: Le Penseur.

Valenti, G.M. (2021). Di segno e Modello. Esplorazioni sulla forma libera fra disegno analogico e digitale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Wong, M.-F., Guo, S., Hang, C.-N, Ho, S.-W, Tan, C.-W. (2023). Natural Language Generation and Understanding of Big Code for AI-Assisted Programming: A Review. In Entropy, No. 25(6), p. 6. DOI: 10.3390/e25060888.

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

[1]
L. Baglioni, M. Calvano, and G. M. Valenti, “Visible Logic: Algorithmic Drawing and the Construction of Form”, diségno, no. 17, pp. 195–202, Apr. 2026.

Issue

Section

Drawing the Structure. Codes, Methods, and Tools