Flying Cities. Hetherarchy, Macroscopy and Stratifications in the Marginal Drawings of 1960-1990

Authors

  • Telmo Castro Department of Architecture, Escola Superior Artistica do Porto
  • Andrea Pirinu Department of Environmental Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari
  • Giancarlo Sanna Department of Environmental Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.9.2021.9

Keywords:

macroscopies, heterarchy, paper architectures, marginal spaces, Flying Cities

Abstract

This work aims to investigate the essential principles and generative systems of imaginary drawing with particular reference to the production created between 1960 and 1990 and depicting flying, dynamic, suspended, floating architectures, free from any law of physics.The hand and the drawing can see things that the eye has not yet seen, materialize the impossible, conceive something that, perhaps, could exist only in the distant future and on distant mental planes: these creation depict spaces that can exist only on paper (hence "paper architecture").
These architectural ‘evocation’ drawings, however, also have a real design value and, although far-fetched, represent the object of a profound research carried out by several visionary authors-artists-architects such as Ron Herron, Peter Cook, Constant Nieuwenhuys or Yona Friedman and later Raimund Abraham, Lebbeus Woods and, in some proposals, Aldo Rossi. All these authors mentioned above investigate the marginal design but with different purposes, values and models therefore the graphic results vary a lot. In the space of the sheet of paper where everything is possible, the compositional and aggregation principles of architecture become a virtuosity free from the physical limitations of the reality in which we live, a space in which the authors, fascinated by the sky, even come to make buildings and cities hover in the air.

References

Allen, L., Pearson, L. (2016). Drawing Futures Speculations in Contemporary Drawing for Art and Architecture. London: UCL Press, University College London.

Berger, J. (2008). Modos de Ver (1st ed.). Lisboa: Antígona Editores Refractários.

Cook, P. (2008). Drawing:The motive force of architecture.West Sussex: Wiley.

Foucault, M. (1984). A arqueologia do saber. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Friedman, Y. (2006). Pro domo. Barcelona: Actar.

Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The Dialectics of Sketching. In Creativity Research Journal, V. 4, pp. 123-143.

Jacobson, C. (2015). Slow Manifesto: Lebbeus Woods Blog. Nova York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Leach, N. (1997). Rethinking Architecture: A reader in cultural theory. London. New York: Routledge.

Molina, J. (2001). Las lecciones del dibujo. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.

Mucci, M. (2016). The fall and Rise: Lebbeus Woods´ Metaphorical and Narrative Drawings. In L. Allen, L.C. Pearson (Eds.). Drawing Futures, pp. 155-161. London: Bartlett School of Architecture.

Petherbridge, D. (2010). Nailing the Liminal: The Difficulties of Defining Drawing. In S. Garner (Ed.). Writing on Drawing Essays on Drawing Practice and Research, pp. 27-41. Bristol: Intellect Books.

Rajchman, J., Virilio, P. (1998). Constructions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Spiller, N. (2006). Visionary Architecture Blueprints of Modern Imagination. London:Thames & Hudson.

Woods, L. (1992). Anarchitecture: architecture is a political act. In A+D Monograph. No 22. London: Academy Editions.

Woods, L. (1993). War and architecture = Rat i arhitektura. Nova York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
T. Castro, A. Pirinu, and G. Sanna, “Flying Cities. Hetherarchy, Macroscopy and Stratifications in the Marginal Drawings of 1960-1990”, diségno, no. 9, pp. 71–82, Dec. 2021.

Issue

Section

Urban Visions