Representing the Invisible. The Integral Plan for the Architectural and Cultural Landscape of Maní, Yucatán

Laura María Lázaro San José

doi:10.26375/disegno.15.2024.26

Authors

Laura María Lázaro San José Department of Theory of Architecture and Architectural Projects, University of Valladolid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.15.2024.26

Keywords:

Colony landscape, Mayan landscape, Cultural memory, Maní, General Plan

Abstract

For a place to be identified as a landscape, there is first a personal decision to differentiate it as an element of value; then there is a necessary process of transversal argumentation of its landscape intensity, and finally, it is disseminated in a clear and accessible way. However, on many occasions, what is really necessary is a method of visibility, of representation of blurred or unnoticed landscapes, which does not consist so much in contemplating the physical environment, but in understanding the cultural and collective memory that they hold. In this direction, the case of the Integral Plan for the enhancement of the landscape of Maní in Yucatán (Mexico) is presented as an example in which its graphic interpretation is a key tool for rescuing and conserving its cultural heritage. The ancient colonial city, and former Mayan ceremonial center, has come down to us today as a confused space of overlapping and unintelligible memories. The Plan –elaborated at intercontinental distance, without previous graphic documentation and affected by the restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic– proposes to define the city from a personal vision and by means of different systems of representation and scales to offer a synthetic and comprehensible reading of the whole. Therefore, in this case, the choice of an eloquent method of graphic interpretation of the architecture, landscape and territory becomes the most effective instrument for the dissemination of heritage that is now culturally accessible.

References

Aníbarro, M.Á. (Ed.). (2017). Fisionomías del paisaje: un diálogo interdisciplinar. Madrid: Editorial Rueda.

Ávila Sánchez, H. (2009). Periurbanización y espacios rurales en la periferia de las ciudades. In Estudios Agrarios, No. 41, Vol. 15, pp. 93-123.

Ballester, J.M. (2017). Del patrimonio al paisaje: el Convenio Europeo del paisaje y el programa del Valle del Nansa. In M.Á. Aníbarro (Ed.). Fisionomías del paisaje: un diálogo interdisciplinary, pp. 107-118. Madrid: Editorial Rueda.

Baños Ramírez, O. (2003). Hamaca y cambio social en Yucatán. In Revista Mexicana del Caribe, No. 15, Vol. 8, pp. 169-214.

Borges, J.L. (1992). Obras completas 1941-1960. Barcelona: Círculo de Lectores.

De Landa, F.D. (2001). Relación de las cosas de Yucatán. México: Dante.

Chico, P. (2000). Transformaciones y evolución de la arquitectura religiosa de Yucatán durante los siglos XVI y XVII. La metodología de la investigación histórica de la arquitectura y el urbanismo en un caso de estudio. PhD thesis in Urban Planning, director C. Chanfón Olmos. Facultad de Arquitectura, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM).

Gendrop, P., Villalobos, A. (2012). Ciudades mesoamericanas y acropolis artificiales. In Bitácora Arquitectura, No. 1, pp. 5-11.

Gerhard, P. (1991). La frontera sureste de la Nueva España. México: National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM).

Klee, P. (2013). Creative Confession and other Writings. Tate Publishing [First ed. Schöpferische Konfession, Berlin: Erich Reiß Verlag 1920].

Kubler, G., Gasparini, G., Gil-Bermejo, J., Buschiazzo, M.J., Tierno, E., Guarda, G., Borah, W., Ricard, R., Nicolini, A., Stanislawski, D. (2014). La ciudad Colonial del Nuevo Mundo: formas y sentidos II. República Dominicana: Cielonaranja.

Lapayese, C. (2008). Acciones culturales en el paisaje. Dimensiones de la memoria. In 4th European Symposium on Research in Architecture and Urban Design, EURAU’08. Madrid 16-19 January 2008, pp. 87-91. Madrid: Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.

Lázaro San José, L.M. (2023). El recorrido como estrategia de intervención proyectual en Paisajes Patrimoniales. In Constelaciones, No. 11, pp. 283-289.

Loveland Roys, R. (1957). The Political Geography of the Yucatan Maya. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.

Médiz Bolio, A. (1985). Libro de Chilam Balam de Chumayel. México: Secreataría de Educación Pública.

Okoshi Harada T. (2012). El cúuchcabal de los Xiu: análisis de su formación y consolidación. In New World Archaeology, Vol. 4, pp. 231-250.

Prada Llorente, E.I. (2012 January). Paisaje, lugar e identidad. El Blog de José Fariña. <http://elblogdefarina.blogspot.com.es/2012/01/paisaje-lugar- e-identidad.html> (Accessed 21Jenuary 2024).

Quezada, S. (2001). Breve historia de Yucatán. Fideicomiso Historia de las Américas. Serie Breves, Historias de los Estados de la República Mexicana. México: EFE, El College of Mexico.

Secretaría de Fomento Económico y Trabajo (SEFOET) (2024). <http://www.sefoet.yucatan.gob.mx/secciones/ver/mani> (accessed 11 September 2024).

Suárez, M.G. (2014). El convento de Maní, Yucatán, en 1588. In Boletín De Monumentos Históricos, No. 31, pp. 78-92.

<https://fomentoculturalbanamex.org/> (accessed 23 November 2023).