The Amnesia of Formal Composition

Authors

  • Chiara Simoncini Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Firenze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.13.2023.19

Keywords:

memory, formal composition, ritual, digital composition

Abstract

If drawing has always been a tool for expressing the ideational design process, with a strenuous search for synthesis aimed at accelerating the necessary times facilitated by digital introduction, the integrated elaboration capacity of the idea has increasingly been lost. This loss has given rise to partially sterile hypotheses devoid of that world of forms and the search for form, which constitute true architectural and spatial projects. Aldo Rossi’s drawings come to mind, where a coffee maker could become, as we would say today, an essential object in the domestic ritual, a house, but also a tower, a viewpoint, or even part of what he himself called ‘domestic theater’, where pure forms could combine to create, with dimensions not coinciding with reality, simple objects of common use that could become significant elements of interior spaces. We have thus reduced ourselves to no longer knowing how to compose but to seek sophisticated elaborations of volumes that fall into a love for complication rather than a simplification that contemporary reality requires. But if the digital world can ‘bend’ to ideative will, why can’t we integrate it instead of replacing it with what is effectively the project, understood as a process of investigation?

References

Arìs, C. M. (2012). Le variazioni dell’identità, il tipo in architettura. Milano: Cittàstudi.

Baeza, A. C. (2018). Principia architectonica. Milano: Christian Marinotti Editore.

Espuelas, F. (2004). Il vuoto. Riflessioni sullo spazio in architettura. Milano: Christian Marinotti Editore.

Focillon, H. (1990). Vita delle forme seguito da Elogio della mano. Torino: Einaudi.

Koolhaas, R. (1997). Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. New York: The Monacelli Press.

Lynch, K. (2001). L’immagine della città. Venezia: Marsilio Editore.

Moneo, R. (2005). Inquietudine teorica e strategia progettuale nell’opera di otto architetti contemporanei. Milano: Electa.

Monestiroli, A. (2002). La metopa e il triglifo. Nove lezioni di architettura. Bari: Editori Laterza.

Purini, F. (2000). Comporre l’Architettura. Bari: Editori Laterza.

Rogers, E. N. (2002). Esperienza dell’Architettura. Ginevra: Skira Editore.

Rogers, E. N. (2006). Gli elementi del fenomeno architettonico. Milano: Christian Marinotti Editore.

Rossi, A. (2009). Autobiografia scientifica. Milano: Il saggiatore.

Rossi, A. (2018). L’architettura della città. Milano: Il saggiatore.

Schumacher, P. (2004). Digital Hadid. Landscape in motion. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Tavora, F. (2021). Dell’organizzazione dello spazio. Milano: nottetempo.

Tessenow, H. (2016). Osservazioni elementary sul costruire. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Venezia, F. (2022). Che cos’è l’architettura. Milano: Electa.

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
C. Simoncini, “The Amnesia of Formal Composition”, diségno, no. 13, pp. 173–182, Dec. 2023.

Issue

Section

Theories and Research