Drawing, Measurement and Movement. The Representation of Space in Urban Maps (an Interdisciplinary Analysis)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.7.2020.16

Keywords:

urban maps, urban drawing, urban space, movement in space, perception and action

Abstract

Urban maps represent the simplified drawing of a complex world (urban space) where material and immaterial phenomena, problems and solutions coexist; they are a tool used by individuals to perceive and act in space.
In our current socio-urban context these representations are particularly interesting, above all due to the complexity of contemporary metropolises. Maps accompany us in our complex “urban” life more as maps of complexity than maps of the city. The contribution tackles this issue from the point of view of representation and the individual. It illustrates an interdisciplinary study that analyses the complexity of represented space, i.e., of the urban (such as spatial and social concentration, anthropological expression and system) and the problems linked to the complexity of its representation (i.e., the complexity of urban maps) which is solved by simplexity. It also analyses man’s capacity to act and move in real space (linked to the vital impulses of the organism, propriocetion and kinesthesia and the wonderful and extremely plastic ability to move in the environment) and thus the possibility of an individual to act and move in space through representation – linking his action to represented space and exploiting his brain’s ability to foresee movement in the drawing, i.e., in the map.

References

Anderson, P.W. (2011). More is Different. Notes from a Thoughtful Curmudgeon. Singapore: World Scientific.

Benasayag, M. (2016). Il cervello aumentato, l’uomo diminuito. Trento: Ed. Erickson.

Berthoz, A. (2011). La semplessità. Torino: Codice (ebook) [First edition. La simplexité. Paris 2009].

Bertuglia, C.S., Vaio, F. (2019). Il fenomeno urbano e la complessità. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

Booth, C. (1902). Life and Labour of the People in London. London: Macmillan.

Bronzaft, L.A. (2004). Interview on The New York Subway Map 1979. Newsday, 2004. In Genzlinger, 2020.

Garfield, S. (2016). Sulle mappe. Il mondo come lo disegniamo. Milano: PonteAlleGrazie-Salani Editore.

Genzlinger, N. (25/02/2020). Michael Hertz - You’ve Surely Seen His Subway Map - Dies at 87. The New York Times.

Gravano, A. (2016). Antropología de lo urbano. Colección Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. Santiago (Chile): LOM ediciones.

Marr, D. (1982). Vision. A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman & Company.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Fenomenologia della percezione. Milano: Bompiani [Prima ed. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris 1945].

Morabito, C. (2020). Il motore della mente. Il movimento nella storia delle scienze cognitive. Bari-Roma: Laterza (ebook).

Mumford, L. (2007). La cultura delle città. Torino: Einaudi editore [Prima ed. The Culture of Cities. Orlando Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Inc. 1938].

Poincaré, H. (1902). La scienza e l’ipotesi. Bari: Dedalo [2012].

Ricoeur, P. (1978). Urbanización y secularización. In Ética y Cultura. Buenos Aires: Docencia, pp. 123-136.

Sacks, O. (2001). L’uomo che scambiò sua moglie per un cappello. Milano: Adelphi Edizioni [Prima ed. The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat. 1985].

Sherrington, C.S. (1906). The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New Haven: Yale University Press [1920], pp. 336-344 (The proprio-ceptive system and the head).

Taullard, A. (1940). Los libros más antiguos de Buenos Aires: 1580-1880. Buenos Aires: J. Peuser SA.

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

[1]
“Drawing, Measurement and Movement. The Representation of Space in Urban Maps (an Interdisciplinary Analysis)”, diségno, no. 7, pp. 151-164, Dec. 2020.

Issue

Section

For defining a reason between thought and project